Seattle Fast Food Workers Vote to Strike

FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE:

SEATTLE FAST FOOD WORKERS VOTE TO STRIKE

Thursday action part of global day of protest against low wages

SEATTLE – Fast food workers in Seattle today announced their plans to join a global fast-food strike planned for Thursday, May 15.

The workers voted Tuesday to take the strike action, part of a continuing movement to pressure giant corporations to raise wages and lift workers out of poverty.

Seattle fast-food workers previously have gone on strike on May 30 and Aug. 29, 2013.

Workers plan to rally at 4 p.m. on Thursday, May 15 at Westlake Park in Seattle. Strike locations and further details to be announced later.

Media Contact: Sejal Parikh, sejal@workingwa.org

Frequently Asked Questions about the “Fight for $15”

1. Does higher pay mean fewer jobs? No. According to numerous studies, raising the minimum wage shows little negative impact on the number of jobs[1]. This may surprise you if you’re used to trickle-down economics, but the data shows that when wages are raised in a broad manner the workers use that increase in wages to increase demand for consumer goods.

Nick Hanauer, a multi-millionaire venture capitalist, wrote about the need to raise the minimum wage to $15 an hour in Bloomberg.

“Raising the minimum wage to $15 an hour would inject about $450 billion into the economy each year. That would give more purchasing power to millions of poor and lower-middle-class Americans, and would stimulate buying, production and hiring.

Raising the earnings of all American workers would provide all businesses with more customers with more to spend.[2]

 

2. These jobs are supposed to be stepping stones, not careers.

The economy has changed and the fastest growing jobs are fast food and service jobs that pay poverty wages[3]. Regardless of what you think these jobs are “meant to be,” the people working these jobs deserve better than poverty wages and they should have the right to organize without retaliation.

Even though Washington State has the highest state minimum wage in the country, you can’t afford to support yourself on $9 and change — let alone put money aside to reach out to a better future.

 

3. I worked my way up why can’t they?

These fast food and service jobs are the fastest growing jobs, and they offer few opportunities. Almost 90% of jobs in fast food are front-line poverty-wage jobs[4], so it’s simply not possible for most people to “work their way up” in the field. And despite the fairytales about starting out on the fryer and eventually owning a franchise, the cost of opening a fast-food outlet is incredibly high[5], and far out of reach for a minimum-wage employee:

For example, if you aspire to open a McDonald’s outlet:

To be considered for a franchise, a minimum of $750,000 of personal funds is normally required. This amount has to be yours – it can't be borrowed, such as by way of a credit line.

A prospective franchisee must put at least 25% cash as a down payment toward the total cost of purchasing an existing restaurant. The remainder can be financed, but for a maximum of seven years. For a new restaurant, McDonald's requires 40% of the entire cost of the store be paid in cash at the outset.

Equipment and pre-opening costs for a new store generally run from $959,450 to $2.11 million.

Franchisees pay a service fee based on the restaurant’s sales. Currently, that's set at 4% of monthly sales, along with rent that's due.

In order to open a new restaurant, a $45,000 initial franchise fee is paid to McDonald's.

 

The numbers for Burger King are similar:

The total investment needed to begin operating a restaurant will range from around $316,100 to $2.66 million.

Starting costs include a $50,000 initial franchise fee (it can be less when the term of the franchise agreement is under 20 years).

To qualify as a franchisee, you need net worth of $1.5 million and $500,000 in liquid assets.

Royalties are currently a monthly fee of 4.5% of gross sales.A monthly advertising contribution of 4% of gross sales is also collected by the corporate parent.

 

And Wendy’s?:

Getting in on Wendy's (WEN), which is selling more of its company-owned stores to franchisees, is extremely difficult. Currently, it's only accepting applications for prospective franchisees who want and can afford to open or buy multiple stores. Applications aren't being taken for single new restaurant owners. (Large operators aren't uncommon in the restaurant industry. One of the biggest, NPC International, owns more than 1,000 restaurants, including Wendy's stores.)

You must have net worth of at least $5 million. This could include liquid assets, retirement accounts or real estate, among other holdings.

Liquid assets of at least $2 million are required.

 

4. Giving people better pay in these jobs would make them give up their dreams.

When workers earn more money they can afford to go back to school, put money away and plan for their future. Getting livable wages frees them from the paycheck to paycheck mentality and lets them have a path to move towards their dreams.

 

5. Won’t this drive business out of our city/county/state?

All signs point to no. Minimum wages already vary from state to state by as much as $2 an hour and businesses don’t decide which state they will operate in solely on the basis of the wage differences. In fact, the dollar menu costs the same $1 in states that have a $7.25 minimum wage as it does here in Washington.

Here in Washington State there are fast food outlets right on the border with Idaho. Idaho has a much lower minimum wage of $7.25, compared to the $9.19 in Washington State, yet a McDonald’s franchisee recently told KPLU radio he didn’t even consider moving his restaurant 20 feet across the street into Idaho when he rebuilt recently[6].  Why? He had a good location that generated strong demand.

Another local example would be in Vancouver, WA where due to our state’s sales tax, prices are about 9% higher than they would be in Oregon. Not to mention the minimum wage is higher in Washington State. Yet, plenty of fast food outlets make Vancouver their home, instead of the lower cost state right across the river.  Why? Because there’s demand for fast food close to home in Vancouver.

There are numerous elements that make a business succeed or fail. Labor costs are one factor, but only one. Businesses will locate where there is enough demand to operate successfully, and higher wages increase demand[7].

Here’s another example. In 2007 the minimum wage in Washington was 54% higher than nearby Idaho, and the usual suspects all said it would mean doom for small businesses. The New York Times reported on what really happened:

“Nearly a decade ago, when voters in Washington approved a measure that would give the state’s lowest-paid workers a raise nearly every year, many business leaders predicted that small towns on this side of the state line would suffer.

But instead of shriveling up, small-business owners in Washington say they have prospered far beyond their expectations. In fact, as a significant increase in the national minimum wage heads toward law, businesses here at the dividing line between two economies — a real-life laboratory for the debate — have found that raising prices to compensate for higher wages does not necessarily lead to losses in jobs and profits."[8]

This is all evidence backing up a study on the effect of minimum wage increases on restaurant employment:

Bill Lester of the University of North Carolina-Chapel Hill was on the team that looked at 16 years worth of restaurant employment data for 316 pairs of border counties.

“And when you add up all those comparisons and look at the average of all those differences in employment, the difference is zero,” said Lester.

Or, to put it another way: When the minimum wage increases, said Lester,“On aggregate, there's no job losses.”

 

6. The minimum wage wasn’t meant to be a living wage, right?

The fastest growing jobs pay poverty wages. A majority of the jobs created since the recession, 58% are low paying jobs[9]. Like it or not, these are the jobs that are being created. If we want to kick start this economy, we need to make sure people are paid enough so they can support themselves, afford the basics, and spend money.

 

7. Won’t raising the wages raise the prices?

Let’s get beyond cartoon economics here. Pricing depends on a lot of factors besides labor costs, including rent, demand, turnover, efficiency, food costs, and consumers’ willingness to pay.

That’s why a recent study by Federal Reserve economists has estimated that for every 10% increase in wages, about a 1% increase in costs could be passed on to the consumer. That means a 60% wage increase could increase prices by a measly 6%.[10]

So even if despite their billions in profits, McDonald’s decided to pass on the whole increase to consumers, a Big Mac could go from the average price of $4.56 to a whopping $4.81. Not such a big deal.

And that’s a worst case scenario. Recent studies have actually calculated that raising the minimum wage would drive up demand for consumer goods as workers who are on the lower end of wages tend to spend more of the money they receive as increased wages[11].

Also, the minimum wage across the United States varies from state to state sometimes by as much as $2, but the prices of everyday items is virtually the same[12].

 

8. Fast food jobs aren’t meant to be good jobs.

Regardless of what you think a job is “meant” to be, these are the jobs that people have. Fast food workers are almost all adults with bills to pay, and many of them have families to support[13].

These are not jobs for pocket change or summer spending money. These are jobs that people are tying to support themselves on.

 

9. Robots will take away your jobs, then you’ll be sorry.

Michael Reich, coauthor of a study by the National Employment Law Project told Slate Magazine,

“Technology has been increasing restaurant productivity for some time—think of computerized ordering of supplies, Open Table and Yelp and electronic ovens—but that has not translated into lower employment in the aggregate. Indeed, employment in restaurants has been growing along with the use of technology[14].”

The facts of the matter are that these poverty wage jobs are the fastest growing jobs in our economy. Thousands of low paying jobs were created here in Washington State during the recovery and fear of far off, potential robot overlords should not be an excuse to keep worker pay so low they cannot afford their basic needs.

 

10. Where did the number $15 come from anyway? Why not $25 or $100?

$15 is a number that reflects a wage that will allow a person to pay their bills and obligations and still have some money left over to plan for their future. It works out to be around $30,000/year, a decent wage that sits right at about half of the median income level in the Seattle area[15].

$9.19 is obviously not enough and $100 is obviously a joke — you can’t support yourself on the current minimum, and of course you can’t set the minimum above the median income.  So the answer is somewhere in between — and we think $15 is a good place to start.

In Seattle, for a full-time worker to afford a studio apartment using 33% of their income (the recommended amount to spend on housing) they would need to be paid about $15/hour. For a 1-bedroom? More than $21.

That’s why we think $15 an hour is a modest start that will have a real, positive effect on workers. This movement is about workers getting paid a decent, living wage and the community pushing for a much needed economic boost. When low wage earners are paid more, they go out and spend it. The money is pushed out into the community lifting everyone up. That’s basic fairness and economic stimulus.


[1] http://www.igmchicago.org/igm-economic-experts-panel/poll-results?SurveyID=SV_br0IEq5a9E77NMV

[2] http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-06-19/the-capitalist-s-case-for-a-15-minimum-wage.html

[3] http://www.nelp.org/page/-/Job_Creation/LowWageRecovery2012.pdf?nocdn=1

[4] http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/07/25/fast-food-industry-mobility-_n_3645415.html

[5] http://finance.yahoo.com/news/what-it-takes-to-start-a-fast-food-franchise-222831956.html

[6] http://www.kplu.org/post/why-wont-mcdonalds-move-20-feet-lower-wage-idaho

[7] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/11/us/11minimum.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

[8] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/11/us/11minimum.html?pagewanted=all&_r=0

[9] http://www.nelp.org/index.php/content/content_about_us/tracking_the_recovery_after_the_great_recession

[10] http://www.epionline.org/studies/aaronson_06-2006.pdf

[11] http://www.chicagofed.org/digital_assets/publications/working_papers/2007/wp2007_23.pdf

[12] http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/11/us/11minimum.html?hp&ex=1168578000&en=bf304392cdc5baf4&ei=5094&partner=homepage&_r=0

[13] http://www.cleveland.com/business/index.ssf/2013/08/fast-food_workers_more_often_a.html

[14] http://motherboard.vice.com/blog/relax-a-minimum-wage-hike-wont-bring-on-the-robot-overlords

[15] http://www.kingcounty.gov/exec/PSB/BenchmarkProgram/Economy/EC02_Income.aspx

Customers turn away from Subway - in support of striking worker

“I’ll be honest, I love Subway’s sandwiches,” said Michelle standing outside of the 8th and Olive Subway holding her umbrella. “I eat there all the time, but not anymore. I can’t believe they fired a striking worker. That’s wrong.”

She wasn’t alone.Boycott Subway Banner v2-page-001

Customers going to downtown Subways during the all important lunch rush were confronted with a choice as community members and workers stood outside with a large banner with a simple message across it - “Strike Back Against Retaliation. Boycott Subway.”

Subway fired a striking worker, Carlos Hernandez, after he helped lead a citywide fast food workers’ strike. Now he, his former co-workers and community members are speaking out in response.

Carlos came out to talk to potential customers the entire week during the lunch rush handing out fliers and telling his story.

“I want my job back to show my co-workers they don’t have to be afraid,” he said talking to a customer who eventually decided not to go into Subway. “I went out on strike for better pay and better working conditions not only for me, but for them too. Subway didn’t like that, but we have to stand up for our rights no matter what.”

One customer, Anne, came up to us in front of the 3rd and Union Subway with something to tell us.

“I got your flyer yesterday,” she said. “I made my own sandwich today.”

Duane, a man sporting an over-sized jacket, grey hair and a wooden cane, came over to the boycott action when he saw the banner.

“You all got my support.100%,” he said shaking the hand of a community member holding the banner. “I’ve been through plenty of boycotts and they all come down to one thing, discipline. So stay strong, keep at it.”

“There is discrimination that can only be stopped by hitting them where it hurts,” Duane continued. “The pocket. I’m telling everybody not to eat at Subway.”

They blamed it on a cookie?

Subway fired Carlos Hernandez after he helped lead a citywide fast food strike. Then they tried to blame it on a 66 cent cookie. Retaliation is wrong and we’re not going to let them get away with it: if Subway won’t give Carlos his job back, they won’t get our business. nosandwich

Send an email directly to the Subway franchise owner who fired Carlos, and tell him you will boycott Subway until he stops retaliating and gives Carlos his job back.

Carlos and his coworkers know he wasn’t fired over a cookie. Just days before he was fired, a manager told him to stop “rabble rousing.” Other workers were told they shouldn’t talk to Carlos anymore. It’s pretty obvious that this was retaliation, and the 66 cent cookie was just a convenient excuse.

Click here to send an email to the Subway franchise owner who fired Carlos — and to Subway Corporate. Tell them you are going to boycott Subway until Carlos gets his job back.

Subway is already feeling the pressure.

We’ve picketed outside of numerous Subway locations owned by the same major franchise owner who retaliated against Carlos, essentially shutting down the lunch rush. We filed federal charges against both the franchise owner and Subway Corporate. We even took our pickets to the pages of Yelp.

And now we are calling for a boycott of Subway until Carlos gets his job back.

Click here to join the boycott — and tell Subway why.

Don't you buy that Footlong!

“I heard about this Subway thing from my local paper in Bremerton,” said Cory, who had come to Seattle for the picket line near Pike Place Market. “I had to come out here. My granddaughter works at Subway and I’d hate for her to have to put up with this mistreatment. Subway needs to respect its workers and give Carlos his job back.” gallerycarlos2

Subway fired a striking worker, Carlos, a week after he helped lead a city wide fast food worker strike.  In response, the community has created an online petition, given one star reviews on Yelp and taken our message to the streets — six different Subway stores in less than a week.

From the Broadway Subway up on Capitol Hill, the Subway across from the Olive 8 hotel, the Subway at Pike Place Market, to the local headquarters of this chain of Subways at the corner of Denny and Fairview, the pickets have brought the lunch rush at the sandwich maker to a screeching halt.

Customers saw our picket, read the information and turned away – siding with the workers instead of the corporate footlong maker.

A worker wearing a traffic caution vest refused to cross the picket line. “I ain’t eating no scab sandwiches!”

A trio entered the Subway after grabbing a leaflet, read it and then all walked out of the store shaking their heads and giving thumbs up to the crowd.

A man wearing a Sounders knit cap with the Subway logo emblazoned on it, took a flier explaining the situation, stopped and talked with us, pulled out a camera and then refused to eat at Subway.

A crew of construction workers walking up from a job a few blocks away saw the picket line, read the information and turned away, seeking lunch elsewhere.

The community support has been overwhelming and the local media has taken notice as well.

TV cameras from KIRO, KOMO and KING 5 showed up at the various pickets talking to the workers and community members who came out in support of Carlos and his fellow workers.  News articles flew off the pages in The Stranger, The Puget Sound Business Journal, KPLU, The Stand, Salon and The Capitol Hill Blog.

“I’m just so grateful for all this support,” said Carlos into a TV camera. “I’m out here because Subway thinks they can keep me quiet and keep its workers down. They can’t. They won’t. We are going to keep fighting for better pay and the right to organize without retaliation. I’ll keep talking to my co-workers, the bosses and anyone who will listen.”

ON STRIKE AGAINST SUBWAY: fast food workers deserve respect

Carlos Hernandez is a Subway worker who helped lead the fast food strikes this summer to demand that the huge, profitable fast food industry treat their workers with respect. Now Subway has fired him — supposedly over a 66¢ cookie.

Federal charges have been filed alleging that Carlos was actually fired in retaliation for his role as a leader in the fast food workers movement.

Everyone should have the right to speak out for a better life — that's why workers have a legal right to strike. It's unacceptable that instead of listening to workers and considering their concerns, Subway fired a leader in the fast food workers movement and is trying to intimidate other workers from speaking out.

Support Carlos & the fast food workers movement: BOYCOTT SUBWAY until he gets his job back.*

Thousands of fast-food workers have joined a nationwide wave of strikes for better pay and the right to organize. Almost every one of these workers went back to work without incident. Why? Because it's illegal to fire someone for striking — and because the law has been backed up by overwhelming community support.

Carlos is a true leader who helped organize the May 30th and August 29th strikes.

He spread the word to his co-workers, and successfully encouraged many to join him on strike, forcing several stores to close. He joined strikelines outside the store where he works, and even spoke out at the rallies which culminated both Seattle fast food strikes.

His managers repeatedly tried to intimidate him into quieting down, but Carlos continued to stand up for what he believed in: better pay & working conditions for fast food workers like him.

Carlos knew that speaking out could be a risk, but spoke out anyway because he thought it was important to be there for his coworkers and for his community.

Now it's time for all of use — workers, customers, and community — to be there for Carlos too.

Everyone should have the right to speak out for a better life. It's unacceptable that instead of listening to workers and considering their concerns, Subway has chosen to fire Carlos.

Don't shop at Subway until they commit to respect the law and give Carlos his job back.

*Our dispute is with Subway. We are not asking anyone to boycott a neutral employer.